Medical Ethicists Raising The Stakes


Many of you know that my concentration as both an undergraduate and graduate student was Medical Ethics. I came to it naturally, really. My hero, my grandmother, was a nurse, and practiced up into her mid-70′s. And, I was a Philosophy major in college. My advisor was the Medical Ethicist for the State of NC, so a natural progression for me to go into that area. At the time, my focus was on Senior Citizens after watching the patronizing, condescending way the nurses treated my grandmother when she landed in the hospital one time. She who resembled a Marine Drill Sergeant more than anything else, who had been the charge nurse for years and years, and who was still most definitely sharp as a tack.

But with Medical Ethics, one has to be prepared for any number of issues to arise, including while I was at Union, in NYC. Many people don’t realize this, but NYC has the largest gay population in the country, and when AIDS hit, it hit there HARD. I was in graduate school at the time. And AIDS was the focus of my Master’s thesis, especially since a number of my friends at Union were, sadly, diagnosed with the disease.

And so, it always catches my eye when I see Medical Ethics discussed in the media. That was definitely the case when I saw this headline yesterday, “Ethicists Argue for Post Birth Abortions.” Wow, WHAT?? Did I really read that right? Sadly, the answer is: yes. I did, and so did you.
Continue reading

OBAMAS ASSAULT ON THE CONSTITUTON AND BILL OF RIGHTS~William Boe~ Part III. UNDERMINING THE CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS


           III. UNDERMINING THE CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS

Mr. Obama is not a liberal.  Liberals respect the Constitution, as do conservatives.  Mr. Obama however does not. Why? Simple.  The Constitution stands in the path of his progressive agenda, as described above.  Therefore, he is doing exactly what you would expect him to do, i.e. attacking the Constitution on all fronts, as I will show.  

In addition, he is appointing fellow progressives as Judges. In case you have not noticed, we have three of them on the Court now.  One of them stated recently that she prefers the South African Constitution to the American Constitution which if memory serves she took an oath to uphold.  Another, who had no prior judicial experience, refuses to recuse herself from the Obama care case, even though as Solicitor General, she participated in emails discussing the “legal issues, arguments and strategy concerning “the anticipated Obama care litigation”. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/01/26/evidence-mounts-against-justice-kagan-for-recusal-in-obamacare-suit/  At a minimum, that raises a strong appearance of impropriety, and Chief Justice Roberts’ defense of her decision does not change the verdict.  It merely reflects a desire to defend the institution. Continue reading